One thing that came up was the need for training and that privacy awareness training hasn't had the effect hoped for. Given that awareness training is exactly that, is it no surprise that once the, usually, one hour presentation on how we should all care about privacy is made nothing happens?
Primarily this is because awareness training is by its very nature very abstract at best and irrelevant at worst. Awareness training is also rarely followed up by more context relevant training, for example, for the software architects or programmers or marketers and so on.
There are various reasons for this, mainly, that to continue training in such a manner takes a great deal of effort to set up and comes with an interesting catch-22 problem: the privacy department/group/... probably doesn't have any engineers; which makes generating relevant training for engineers remarkably difficult.
Worse is that because of the current nature of privacy - it is primarily a legal discipline, albeit one trying to break through to engineering - very few engineers move towards or even into privacy.
One member of the audience at the DPIntensive workshop remarked on this stating that this was one of their biggest problems, especially as they had so much to learn from engineering.
The other major difficulty is that the structures that need to be put in place in order to translate between a legal discipline and an engineering one are undoubtedly complex. Consider a linguist trying to create a translation into an as yet not understood language: first one must understand the script, the syntactic structure and then the semantic ones - not to mention the whole problem of the pragmatic structures and idioms that exist before a degree of fluency is reached that makes translation or even basic conversation possible.
So, the problem with privacy awareness training is that it becomes almost impossible to follow up and continue beyond anything more than a broad, common denominator.
Such training however are fantastic for metrics ... make the training compulsory and you'll get 99% of the company taking the training - which normally lasts an hour, can be delivered by webcast or similar. Working with metrics and a delivery mechanism like that makes it an amazing vehicle for improving 'management' metrics. Which in this case are exactly the wrong metrics, at least from the point of view of the good of the company.
So next time you create a privacy awareness training consider :
- whether that training is aimed at a particular audience, or it is broad and generic
- how that training is to be followed up
- what effects do you expect to see
- measurement of must be made on what effects of the training actually went into practice
- the programmers
- the engineers
- the overall R&D
- the management
- the marketing department
- the legal department
- the privacy group
Unless all of the above can be answered then the privacy awareness training will have no overall or lasting effect.